Monday, November 25, 2024
HomeNewsSuit Challenging IGP Adamu's Tenure Extension Suffers Setback

Suit Challenging IGP Adamu’s Tenure Extension Suffers Setback

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Inspector General of Police – Mohammed Abubakar Adamu

 

The suit challenging the tenure extension of the Inspector-General of Police, Mr Mohammed Adamu has suffered delay at the Federal High Court due to irregular service of originating processes on the Nigerian Police Council.

The council is the fourth defendant in the matter.

A legal practitioner, Mr Maxwell Opara, filed the suit following the decision of President Muhammadu Buhari to extend the tenure of Adamu as Inspector-General of Police by three months after his retirement on February 1.

At the resumed hearing on Tuesday, counsel to Opara, Ugochukwu Ezekiel, informed the court that counsel to the president and Attorney-General of the Federation, who are the first and third defendants, served a counter affidavit on him.

See also  IGP Speaks On How To Stop Kidnapping In Nigeria

He said that they raised objections to the jurisdiction of the court to hear the matter.

The trial judge, Justice Ahmed Mohammed, however, noticed that there was no legal representation for the fourth defendant.

Reading from the court’s record, the registrar said that it was one Adeyemi, whose status was not stated that received the originating processes.

The judge therefore said that the fourth defendant was not properly served with the processes and the hearing notice, issued on March 8.

See also  Court Restrains Secondus From Acting As PDP National Chairman

Ezekiel, however, said that in his experience, the fourth defendant had been duly served.

“My Lord, in my view, having effected service on the first defendant, whose office, the fourth defendant is under, I believe the Nigeria Police Council is aware of the matter”.

In his ruling, Justice Mohammed held that there was doubt as to whether the fourth defendant was properly served with the originating processes.

“Service is fundamental and we all know what happens to an entire proceeding once there is no proper service.

See also  4 LG Chairmen, Councillors to Face Trial Over Asset Declaration

“The court has to be cautious and ensure that the right thing is done,” the judge said.

He ordered that originating processes be served on the fourth defendant, who had seven days to reply.

He adjourned the matter until March 30, for hearing.

By the suit, the plaintiff wants an order of court for Adamu to resign from office, having spent the mandatory 35 years in service.

- Advertisement -

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular